Banana AnalyticsBANANAANALYTICS

County profile

Stanton County, Nebraska Community Health Profile

Environmental risk, disease burden, provider access, and SDOH scores for community health needs assessment and service line planning. Fused from EPA, CDC, CMS, and Census data into a single free view.

Opportunity Score

38Below Avgout of 100

Env

30

−20 vs U.S. mean

Disease

29

−21 vs U.S. mean

Provider

73

+23 vs U.S. mean

SDOH

32

−18 vs U.S. mean

FIPS: 31167Population: 5,856Risk overview: Near national averages

Specific health risk patterns

Stanton County, NE: 1 specific risk pattern triggered

Each pattern below combines a specific environmental exposure with a population that is more vulnerable to that exposure. When both are present at meaningful levels in Stanton County, the pattern triggers. These are the most concrete data points for documenting a significant health need in a Community Health Needs Assessment and for planning where services or community investment would land hardest.

Internally, we call these “Compound Signals.” Each is a versioned, weighted composite scored against the national distribution. The full formula and citations live on the methodology page.

Runoff Burden· 79Highhigh confidence

281.4 CAFO animal-units per sq mi (90th national percentile) led by cattle.

Agricultural runoff + flood exposure × Uninsured rural population

Defend this finding — full lineage to source data3 sources cited
Runoff Burdenneeds review

Stanton County: 79/100 (elevated above the 70th-percentile threshold)

CAFO density × flood exposure × rural Medicaid coverage gap. Pattern after Hurricane Florence inundated 91 NC swine + 36 poultry CAFOs in 2018.

Weighted composite of cafo_density_pct + flood_exposure + rural_medicaid_gap (component weights documented in the gold pipeline manifest, ticket #90; flood_exposure pending Lynch/Parks 2025 ingestion per ticket #76)

Methodology. Surfaces counties where concentrated animal feeding operations sit in flood-exposed terrain and the local health system is least equipped to absorb the public-health spillover. v1 uses placeholder-friendly formulation until Lynch/Parks 2025 lands.

Threshold. Elevated when score ≥ 70th national percentile across all US counties evaluated for this signal

Peer set. All US counties evaluated for the signal (~3,222, less coverage gaps)

Components (3)

CAFO density rank (national percentile)weighted leg

90th percentile

National percentile rank of animal-unit density per square mile, derived from USDA livestock head counts and EPA Animal Unit conversion factors.

USDA + EPAUSDA Census of Agriculture + EPA 40 CFR §122.23 AU formula

Vintage: USDA Census of Ag 2022 (most recent quinquennial) · Refresh: Every 5 years · Lag: 1–2 years

Source page →

How it's measured. Per-county livestock head counts (hogs, cattle, dairy, broilers, layers, turkeys, sheep) from USDA Census, multiplied by EPA 40 CFR §122.23 Animal Unit conversion factors, divided by county land area in square miles, then rank-percentile against all US counties.

Caveat. USDA Census suppresses cells where disclosure would identify individual farms, biasing the AU total downward in concentrated-producer counties. Census is quinquennial — between releases the value goes stale.

Coverage. Counties with non-zero animal-unit totals

Flood exposure (Lynch/Parks 2025)weighted legneeds review

County-level flood exposure index from Lynch & Parks 2025 — combines historical flood footprints, FEMA SFHA coverage, and 100-year floodplain population overlap.

Lynch / ParksLynch & Parks 2025 — county flood exposure index (pending ingestion #76)

Vintage: Pending pipeline ingestion (ticket #76) · Refresh: TBD

How it's measured. Peer-reviewed flood-exposure composite combining historical inundation footprints with current FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area coverage. Pending ingestion as of methodology v1.8.0; the v1 Runoff Burden signal uses placeholder-friendly formulation until this lands.

Caveat. Not yet in production JSON. Runoff Burden score is computable from CAFO density + uninsured rural alone in the interim; this leg is reserved for the post-#76 score refresh.

Coverage. All 3,222 US counties when ingested

Rural Medicaid coverage gapweighted legneeds review

Composite of rural-classified census tract share and Medicaid coverage shortfall — proxy for the rural population least insured against environmental health spillover.

Census BureauACS 5-Year + Census urban-rural classification

Vintage: ACS 5-Year 2019–2023; rural classification 2020 decennial · Refresh: Quarterly (ACS); decennial (rural class) · Lag: 1 year (ACS)

Source page →

How it's measured. Weighted blend of rural-classified tract share (Census urban-rural classification) and Medicaid + uninsured rate (ACS). Captures the population that bears the brunt of agricultural-runoff health events without coverage to absorb the medical cost.

Coverage. All 3,222 US counties

7 signals evaluated. See all signal methodologies →

Where Stanton County stands

Health risks here sit near national averages

Stanton County, Nebraska has elevated doctor and specialist shortages — primary care and specialty access rank worse than 73% of U.S. counties. Pollution exposure, chronic disease rates, and social and economic conditions all sit closer to the middle of the national distribution. The issue here is healthcare infrastructure — not enough providers for the population — rather than vulnerability piling up across multiple dimensions. Counties in this profile are candidates for provider-recruitment and capacity-building investment.

Methodology: when three or more of the four major health-risk areas (pollution, chronic disease, doctor access, social and economic conditions) score above the 70th national percentile, we call the pattern “multi-pillar convergence.” The scoring approach and citations live on the methodology page.

Risk profile

Stanton County compared to Nebraska and the U.S. average

Four health-risk scores on a 0-100 scale, where 50 is the U.S. average. A higher score means that area is a stronger contributor to community health risk.

Stanton County four-pillar profile20406080100Disease BurdenEnv RiskSDOH StressProvider Gap

Provider Gap (73) is worse than at least 70% of U.S. counties, the largest contributor to community health risk here.

Environmental Risk (30), Disease Burden (29), and SDOH Stress (32) are at or better than the U.S. average.

  • Stanton County
  • Nebraska state mean
  • U.S. mean (50)
  • Signal threshold (70)

Current Conditions

Today's air quality, fires, and weather alerts

Live operational data for Stanton County: real-time AQI from EPA AirNow, active fires from NIFC, and any National Weather Service advisories. Updated daily.

Current Air Quality
43Good
PM2.5: 7.8 µg/m³ · 2026-05-28
Source: EPA AirNow
Nearest Active Wildfire
Eagle Lake Fire
314 km away · 0 acres
0 fires within 100 km · 0 within 200 km
Source: NIFC active fire perimeters

Environmental Factors

Air, water, and exposure indicators

Top environmental indicators for Stanton County with state and national benchmarks. Full profile covers 40+ metrics on the platform.

IndicatorStanton CountyNE avgUS avg
EPA AQS / EJSCREEN
6.4
µg/m³
+6.1% vs NE
6.17.4
EPA AQS / EJSCREEN
57.4
ppb
+3.6% vs NE
55.457.1
Traffic Proximity
EJSCREEN
47,000
index
-61% vs NE
120,428291,320
NOAA ACIS
4
days/yr
-71% vs NE
1425
Superfund Proximity
EPA EJSCREEN
0.13
score
-59% vs NE
0.310.16
EPA EJSCREEN
0.00
score
-100% vs NE
1.273.39

Wildfire-Attributable Air Quality

Smoke PM2.5 the EPA doesn't count

Stanford peer-reviewed wildfire-attributable PM2.5 for Stanton County. The EPA classifies wildfire smoke as "exceptional events" and excludes it from official AQS monitoring; Childs/Burke fills that gap with daily county-level data.

Annual mean wildfire PM2.5
0.76 µg/m³
8% of the 9 µg/m³ federal annual standard, on top of background air
Smoke days > 55 µg/m³
0
EPA “unhealthy for sensitive groups” threshold · Negligible
Smoke days > 100 µg/m³
0
EPA “unhealthy” threshold · acute exposure days

Source: Childs et al, Environmental Science & Technology 2022 (Harvard Dataverse 10.7910/DVN/DJVMTV). Latest year shipped: 2020. Burke et al, Nature 2023 estimate that the EPA AQS network undercounts wildfire-attributable PM2.5 by 10–30% in fire-affected counties. Coverage is CONUS only. Full methodology →

Severe Weather History

Recorded storm events and damages

NOAA NCEI Storm Events Database for Stanton County, 2010–2026. Cumulative + last 5 years of recorded weather events with deaths, injuries, and damages.

Total events (20102026)
121
37 in the last 5 years
Deaths · injuries
1· 20
cumulative across all event types
Property + crop damage
$16.6M
cumulative reported damages
Events by type
Thunderstorm85
Tornado20
Flood15

Source: NOAA NCEI Storm Events Database (full history rollup). NOAA buckets ~50 raw event_type strings into 8 health-relevant categories. Coverage: 3,107 of 3,222 US counties; the absent are typically Alaska boroughs and territories where NOAA codes events as forecast zones rather than counties. Full methodology →

Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations

Livestock density and federal-permit confidence

USDA Census of Agriculture (vintage 2022) animal-unit totals for Stanton County, normalized to land area and ranked nationally. Animal Units (AU) follow the EPA federal definition under 40 CFR §122.23.

CAFO density rank
90thpercentile · Extreme
National rank of animal units per square mile.
Animal units per sq mi
281.4
Federal CAFO thresholds: 300 AU = “Medium”, 1,000 AU = “Large.” Total AU: 120,350 across 428 sq mi.
Dominant species
Cattle (beef)
Top contributor to the AU total. Other species may also be present.
Medium federal coverage. 20-50% of large CAFOs federally NPDES-permitted in this state (CA, MN, WI, IL, OH, NE, KS).

Source: USDA Census of Agriculture 2022 (head counts) + EPA 40 CFR §122.23 (animal-unit conversion). The CAFO composite deliberately omits NPDES facility counts because federal coverage averages ~32% nationally per EPA-IG and is heavily state-skewed — adding it as a numerator would systematically bias the index toward delegated states. Full methodology →

Pesticide Use

USGS Pesticide National Synthesis

Annual pesticide application rollup for Stanton County from the USGS Pesticide National Synthesis Project. Most recent year on file: 2019. Mass figures use the EPest_HIGH estimate (the conservative-against-undercounting framing); EPest_LOW is also retained on the underlying data.

Density rank (2019)
91thpercentile · Extreme
National rank of kilograms applied per square mile.
Total mass applied
238.0K kg
556.6 kg/sq mi across 35 distinct compounds.
Top compounds by mass
  1. 1.GLYPHOSATE94.1K kg
  2. 2.ACETOCHLOR42.3K kg
  3. 3.ATRAZINE31.1K kg
  4. 4.2,4-D18.5K kg
  5. 5.METOLACHLOR & METOLACHLOR-S10.2K kg

Source: USGS Pesticide National Synthesis Project (2019). USGS PNSP nationally; year 2019 is preliminary; 2018 unavailable; 2020+ not released. Update reliability medium-low. Full methodology →

Health Outcomes

Chronic disease prevalence

CDC PLACES model-based prevalence estimates for adults in Stanton County. Full profile covers 15+ health outcomes plus mortality on the platform.

Stanton County chronic disease prevalence vs. CDC PLACES national benchmarksDepression21.116.4Cancer (any, excl. skin)7.19.9Frequent mental distress (14+ days)14.513.3Coronary heart disease6.07.1Current asthma (adults)9.89.1Stroke3.23.5COPD6.66.8Diabetes11.411.5510152025Prevalence (%)
Stanton County adult disease prevalence vs. CDC PLACES national benchmarks, ranked by absolute divergence. Green connectors mark conditions where Stanton County is below the benchmark; terracotta where above.National benchmarkStanton County
ConditionStanton CountyNE avgUS avg
Current Asthma
% of adults with current asthma
9.1%
-0.8% vs NE
9.2%10.6%
COPD
% of adults with diagnosed COPD
6.8%
-10% vs NE
7.6%8.6%
Diabetes
% of adults with diagnosed diabetes
11.5%
-7.8% vs NE
12.5%13.7%
Coronary Heart Disease
% of adults with CHD
7.1%
-8.9% vs NE
7.8%7.9%
Depression
% of adults ever diagnosed with depression
16.4%
-3.5% vs NE
17.0%23.1%
Frequent Mental Distress
% of adults with 14+ poor mental health days/month
13.3%
-2.2% vs NE
13.6%17.2%

Vulnerable Medicare Population

Who needs the grid to stay alive

Medicare beneficiaries in Stanton County who depend on electricity for dialysis, oxygen, or other powered medical equipment. From the HHS emPOWER program, which CMS publishes monthly so emergency managers know who to find first when the power goes out.

PopulationCountPer 1,000 Medicare
Total Medicare beneficiaries
Denominator
698
Electricity-dependent (any DME)
Ventilators, oxygen concentrators, IV pumps, motorized wheelchairs
35
50.1
-34% vs NE
Dialysis-dependent
ESRD beneficiaries needing in-center or home dialysis
0
0.00
-100% vs NE
Oxygen-dependent
Home oxygen concentrators (outage-vulnerable)
22
31.5
-9.7% vs NE

Source: HHS emPOWER Map (ArcGIS county layer), May 2026. Counts of 1–10 are masked as “≤10” per HHS privacy rules; per-1,000 rates are derived and still respect the privacy floor. Full methodology →

Provider Supply

Specialty physician density per 100,000 residents

Active providers in Stanton County from the CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES). Compared to the U.S. average for each specialty. Adjacency adjustment is applied separately in the Provider Gap pillar score.

SpecialtyStanton CountyUS avg
Primary Care
Family medicine, internal medicine, general practice, pediatrics.
137.1
per 100k
+5.1% vs US
130.4
Psychiatry
Mental health prescribers; complements behavioral health access.
17.1
per 100k
-8.2% vs US
18.7

Source: CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES). Counts reflect providers with a primary practice address in Stanton County; specialty is taken from the provider's primary NUCC taxonomy code.

Pro analytical view

What drives this county's scores

The flagged signals and service-line opportunities for Stanton County, plus the methodology decomposition behind each score. Visible to Pro, Consultant Studio, and Enterprise tiers.

Where to focus

Pro feature

Top flagged signals + service lines are a Pro feature

See how each signal's components blend into its final score, and which signals + service lines this county should prioritize. Available on Professional, Consultant Studio, and Enterprise.

Score decomposition

Each named signal's component breakdown with weights. The bar length is the component's percentile rank; the parenthetical is its weight in the final blend.

Pro feature

Score decomposition is a Pro feature

See how each signal's components blend into its final score, and which signals + service lines this county should prioritize. Available on Professional, Consultant Studio, and Enterprise.

Tract drill-down

Census tracts inside Stanton County

Pro feature

Tract-level drill-down is a Pro feature

See how each signal's components blend into its final score, and which signals + service lines this county should prioritize. Available on Professional, Consultant Studio, and Enterprise.

On the full platform

What else is available for Stanton County

The page above is a subset. The free Community account unlocks the full single-county profile: every indicator, every data source, demographics, historical trends, and mortality data. Professional unlocks multi-county comparison, compound signal analysis, service line rankings, and consultant-ready PDF reports.

Full Environmental Profile

All 40+ environmental metrics including toxic releases, hazardous site proximity, PFAS detection, pesticide exposure, and climate stress indicators.

Service Line Opportunities

See how Stanton County ranks for respiratory, oncology, cardiovascular, renal, endocrine, and behavioral health service line opportunity.

Multi-County Comparison

Compare Stanton County side-by-side with neighboring counties across every dimension.

Trend Analysis

5-year sparklines for health outcomes, SDOH measures, and mortality rates so you can see where the county is heading, not just where it is today.

PDF Report Export

Generate a consultant-ready environmental health briefing for Stanton County with methodology citations. Drops straight into a CHNA or grant application.

See pricing →

Nearby Counties

Counties bordering Stanton County

Adjacent county profiles with their own scores and environmental health data. Source: Census Bureau County Adjacency File.

Data sources: EPA AQS, EPA EJSCREEN, EPA TRI, CDC PLACES, CDC WONDER, CMS NPPES, Census ACS, County Health Rankings, NOAA ACIS, NCI State Cancer Profiles. Every score on this page is derived from publicly available federal data, fused by the Banana Analytics pipeline.

Methodology: See the full scoring methodology (v1.2.0) for weights, sensitivity analysis, and validation against county-level mortality data.

Last refreshed: May 28, 2026