County profile
Juneau City and Borough, Alaska Community Health Profile
Environmental risk, disease burden, provider access, and SDOH scores for community health needs assessment and service line planning. Fused from EPA, CDC, CMS, and Census data into a single free view.
Opportunity Score
Env
11
−39 vs U.S. mean
Disease
16
−35 vs U.S. mean
Provider
15
−35 vs U.S. mean
SDOH
29
−21 vs U.S. mean
Specific health risk patterns
Juneau City and Borough, AK: 1 specific risk pattern triggered
Each pattern below combines a specific environmental exposure with a population that is more vulnerable to that exposure. When both are present at meaningful levels in Juneau City and Borough, the pattern triggers. These are the most concrete data points for documenting a significant health need in a Community Health Needs Assessment and for planning where services or community investment would land hardest.
Internally, we call these “Compound Signals.” Each is a versioned, weighted composite scored against the national distribution. The full formula and citations live on the methodology page.
1,474,050,469 lbs of TRI-reported industrial releases (38,394,257 lbs of carcinogens).
Industrial emissions exposure × Surrounding population
Defend this finding — full lineage to source data5 sources cited
Industrial BurdenJuneau City and Borough: 89/100 (elevated above the 70th-percentile threshold)
Juneau City and Borough: 89/100 (elevated above the 70th-percentile threshold)
TRI facility density × PFAS contamination × pesticide use × total provider access deficit. Captures cumulative industrial environmental load on the surrounding population.
Methodology. Combines three distinct industrial exposure modes (point-source releases, drinking-water contamination, pesticide use) with a generalist provider-access leg since industrial pollution health effects span multiple specialties. Methodology v1.8.0.
Threshold. Elevated when score ≥ 70th national percentile across all US counties evaluated for this signal
Peer set. All US counties evaluated for the signal (~3,222, less coverage gaps)
Components (4)
Number of EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) reporting facilities in the county.
EPA — Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) via Envirofacts
Vintage: TRI 2023 reporting year · Refresh: Annual · Lag: 18 months
How it's measured. Count of facilities reporting any TRI-listed chemical release in the most recent reporting year. TRI thresholds (10K-25K lb manufacturing; 500 lb persistent-bioaccumulative) mean smaller polluters are excluded from this count.
Caveat. TRI is industrial self-report. Underreporting is documented for some sectors and chemicals; the count is a floor, not a ceiling.
Coverage. All 3,222 US counties (zero-inflated; many rural counties = 0)
Composite 0–100 severity score for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) contamination in the county's drinking water and environment.
EPA — UCMR5 (Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule) + ECHO
Vintage: UCMR5 sampling 2023–2025 · Refresh: Quarterly · Lag: 3–6 months
How it's measured. Composite score combining detection frequency, peak concentration relative to EPA Health Advisory Levels, and number of PFAS species detected from UCMR5 public water system sampling and ECHO enforcement records.
Caveat. UCMR5 only samples public water systems serving 3,300+ people; private well users in small or rural communities are not represented.
Coverage. Counties with at least one UCMR5-eligible PWS
Total estimated agricultural pesticide use in the county for the year, in kilograms (EPest_HIGH conservative estimate).
USGS — Pesticide National Synthesis Project (PNSP)
Vintage: PNSP 2019 (preliminary; 2018 unavailable; 2020+ unreleased) · Refresh: Annual when published · Lag: 2–3 years (and the program is on medium-low update reliability)
How it's measured. USGS PNSP estimates county-level pesticide application from USDA Census of Agriculture acreage by crop, multiplied by crop-specific application rates from proprietary surveys. EPest_HIGH is the regional-pool imputation that's conservative against undercounting.
Caveat. PNSP funding was nearly cut in 2023 and the program now publishes irregularly. 2018 has no data; 2020+ is unreleased as of methodology v1.8.0. Use with the data-quality note shown on the platform.
Coverage. 3,054 of 3,222 US counties
Total provider access deficit20%
Inverted national percentile rank of total healthcare specialists per 100K, with a 50/50 adjacency adjustment.
Methodology. Same shape as the specialty-specific deficits. Used by Industrial Burden where the relevant access dimension isn't a single specialty (industrial pollution health effects span pulmonary, cardiovascular, oncologic, and developmental medicine).
Components (2)
All active healthcare specialists in the county, normalized to population.
CMS — NPPES — National Plan and Provider Enumeration System
Vintage: Current month · Refresh: Monthly · Lag: Same month
How it's measured. NPPES registry — all specialty taxonomy codes — geocoded to practice address, summed per county, divided by Census population estimate.
Caveat. NPPES is registration-time data, not practice attestation.
Coverage. All 3,222 US counties
All active healthcare specialists in the county, normalized to population.
CMS — NPPES — National Plan and Provider Enumeration System
Vintage: Current month · Refresh: Monthly · Lag: Same month
How it's measured. NPPES registry — all specialty taxonomy codes — geocoded to practice address, summed per county, divided by Census population estimate.
Caveat. NPPES is registration-time data, not practice attestation.
Coverage. All 3,222 US counties
8 signals evaluated. See all signal methodologies →
Where Juneau City and Borough stands
Health risks here sit near national averages
Juneau City and Borough, Alaska sits near the bottom of the national risk distribution across all four major health-risk areas. Pollution exposure, chronic disease rates, doctor access, and social and economic conditions are all better than most U.S. counties. Communities at this end of the spectrum are useful reference points — they help county health planners and CHNA authors understand what a relatively low-need profile looks like across all four dimensions at once.
Methodology: when three or more of the four major health-risk areas (pollution, chronic disease, doctor access, social and economic conditions) score above the 70th national percentile, we call the pattern “multi-pillar convergence.” The scoring approach and citations live on the methodology page.
Risk profile
Juneau City and Borough compared to Alaska and the U.S. average
Four health-risk scores on a 0-100 scale, where 50 is the U.S. average. A higher score means that area is a stronger contributor to community health risk.
Environmental Risk (11), Disease Burden (16), Provider Gap (15), and SDOH Stress (29) are at or better than the U.S. average.
- Juneau City and Borough
- Alaska state mean
- U.S. mean (50)
- Signal threshold (70)
Current Conditions
Today's air quality, fires, and weather alerts
Live operational data for Juneau City and Borough: real-time AQI from EPA AirNow, active fires from NIFC, and any National Weather Service advisories. Updated daily.
Environmental Factors
Air, water, and exposure indicators
Top environmental indicators for Juneau City and Borough with state and national benchmarks. Full profile covers 40+ metrics on the platform.
| Indicator | Juneau City and Borough | AK avg | US avg |
|---|---|---|---|
Traffic Proximity EJSCREEN | 146,315 index ▲ +108% vs AK | 70,291 | 291,320 |
Superfund Proximity EPA EJSCREEN | 0.00 score ▼ -100% vs AK | 0.13 | 0.16 |
Drinking Water Violations EPA EJSCREEN | 0.00 score ▼ -100% vs AK | 11.01 | 3.39 |
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations
Livestock density and federal-permit confidence
USDA Census of Agriculture (vintage 2022) animal-unit totals for Juneau City and Borough, normalized to land area and ranked nationally. Animal Units (AU) follow the EPA federal definition under 40 CFR §122.23.
Source: USDA Census of Agriculture 2022 (head counts) + EPA 40 CFR §122.23 (animal-unit conversion). The CAFO composite deliberately omits NPDES facility counts because federal coverage averages ~32% nationally per EPA-IG and is heavily state-skewed — adding it as a numerator would systematically bias the index toward delegated states. Full methodology →
Health Outcomes
Chronic disease prevalence
CDC PLACES model-based prevalence estimates for adults in Juneau City and Borough. Full profile covers 15+ health outcomes plus mortality on the platform.
| Condition | Juneau City and Borough | AK avg | US avg |
|---|---|---|---|
Current Asthma % of adults with current asthma | 10.2% ▼ -6.2% vs AK | 10.9% | 10.6% |
COPD % of adults with diagnosed COPD | 5.9% ▼ -20% vs AK | 7.4% | 8.6% |
Diabetes % of adults with diagnosed diabetes | 8.9% ▼ -23% vs AK | 11.6% | 13.7% |
Coronary Heart Disease % of adults with CHD | 5.7% ▼ -19% vs AK | 7.0% | 7.9% |
Depression % of adults ever diagnosed with depression | 21.0% ▲ +9.3% vs AK | 19.2% | 23.1% |
Frequent Mental Distress % of adults with 14+ poor mental health days/month | 14.8% ▼ -9.1% vs AK | 16.3% | 17.2% |
Vulnerable Medicare Population
Who needs the grid to stay alive
Medicare beneficiaries in Juneau City and Borough who depend on electricity for dialysis, oxygen, or other powered medical equipment. From the HHS emPOWER program, which CMS publishes monthly so emergency managers know who to find first when the power goes out.
| Population | Count | Per 1,000 Medicare |
|---|---|---|
Total Medicare beneficiaries Denominator | 6,030 | — |
Electricity-dependent (any DME) Ventilators, oxygen concentrators, IV pumps, motorized wheelchairs | 99 | 16.4 ▼ -73% vs AK |
Dialysis-dependent ESRD beneficiaries needing in-center or home dialysis | ≤10 | 1.82 ▲ +86% vs AK |
Oxygen-dependent Home oxygen concentrators (outage-vulnerable) | ≤10 | 1.8 ▼ -60% vs AK |
Source: HHS emPOWER Map (ArcGIS county layer), May 2026. Counts of 1–10 are masked as “≤10” per HHS privacy rules; per-1,000 rates are derived and still respect the privacy floor. Full methodology →
Provider Supply
Specialty physician density per 100,000 residents
Active providers in Juneau City and Borough from the CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES). Compared to the U.S. average for each specialty. Adjacency adjustment is applied separately in the Provider Gap pillar score.
| Specialty | Juneau City and Borough | US avg |
|---|---|---|
Primary Care Family medicine, internal medicine, general practice, pediatrics. | 159.5 per 100k ▲ +22% vs US | 130.4 |
Cardiology Cardiovascular disease, electrophysiology, interventional cardiology. | 9.4 per 100k ▼ -22% vs US | 12.1 |
Pulmonology Respiratory disease specialists — relevant to PM2.5 and wildfire smoke exposure. | 3.1 per 100k ▼ -48% vs US | 6.0 |
Psychiatry Mental health prescribers; complements behavioral health access. | 25.0 per 100k ▲ +34% vs US | 18.7 |
Oncology / Hematology Cancer specialists. | 3.1 per 100k ▼ -51% vs US | 6.4 |
Neurology Neurological disease specialists. | 6.3 per 100k ▼ -21% vs US | 7.9 |
Source: CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES). Counts reflect providers with a primary practice address in Juneau City and Borough; specialty is taken from the provider's primary NUCC taxonomy code.
Pro analytical view
What drives this county's scores
The flagged signals and service-line opportunities for Juneau City and Borough, plus the methodology decomposition behind each score. Visible to Pro, Consultant Studio, and Enterprise tiers.
Where to focus
Pro feature
Top flagged signals + service lines are a Pro feature
See how each signal's components blend into its final score, and which signals + service lines this county should prioritize. Available on Professional, Consultant Studio, and Enterprise.
Score decomposition
Each named signal's component breakdown with weights. The bar length is the component's percentile rank; the parenthetical is its weight in the final blend.
Pro feature
Score decomposition is a Pro feature
See how each signal's components blend into its final score, and which signals + service lines this county should prioritize. Available on Professional, Consultant Studio, and Enterprise.
Tract drill-down
Census tracts inside Juneau City and Borough
Pro feature
Tract-level drill-down is a Pro feature
See how each signal's components blend into its final score, and which signals + service lines this county should prioritize. Available on Professional, Consultant Studio, and Enterprise.
On the full platform
What else is available for Juneau City and Borough
The page above is a subset. The free Community account unlocks the full single-county profile: every indicator, every data source, demographics, historical trends, and mortality data. Professional unlocks multi-county comparison, compound signal analysis, service line rankings, and consultant-ready PDF reports.
Full Environmental Profile
All 40+ environmental metrics including toxic releases, hazardous site proximity, PFAS detection, pesticide exposure, and climate stress indicators.
Service Line Opportunities
See how Juneau City and Borough ranks for respiratory, oncology, cardiovascular, renal, endocrine, and behavioral health service line opportunity.
Multi-County Comparison
Compare Juneau City and Borough side-by-side with neighboring counties across every dimension.
Trend Analysis
5-year sparklines for health outcomes, SDOH measures, and mortality rates so you can see where the county is heading, not just where it is today.
PDF Report Export
Generate a consultant-ready environmental health briefing for Juneau City and Borough with methodology citations. Drops straight into a CHNA or grant application.
Nearby Counties
Counties bordering Juneau City and Borough
Adjacent county profiles with their own scores and environmental health data. Source: Census Bureau County Adjacency File.
Data sources: EPA AQS, EPA EJSCREEN, EPA TRI, CDC PLACES, CDC WONDER, CMS NPPES, Census ACS, County Health Rankings, NOAA ACIS, NCI State Cancer Profiles. Every score on this page is derived from publicly available federal data, fused by the Banana Analytics pipeline.
Methodology: See the full scoring methodology (v1.2.0) for weights, sensitivity analysis, and validation against county-level mortality data.
Last refreshed: May 28, 2026